Citat:
korisnikk
Hvala bogu,pravni sistemi(civilizovanih drzava)se ne zasnivaju na ovakvom uproscavanju,vec se uvek uzima u obzir i specificno psihicko stanje i sticaj okolnosti.
Tesko da ima i jedne civilizovane drzave gde za ovako nesto ne bi dobio istu ako ne i duzu kaznu.
"Specficno psihicko stanje" bi ti mozda skinulo koju godinu, ali na 2 ubistva, tesko ranjavanje, ugrozavanje zivota ostalih ljudi u okolini... dvocifrena kazna je vise nego vrlo verovatna :)
Evo malo o toj USA gde na filmovima mozes da rokas ljude:
http://www.lectlaw.com/def/d030.htm
Citat:
Use of force is justified when a person reasonably believes that it is necessary for the defense of oneself or another against the immediate use of unlawful force. However, a person must use no more force than appears reasonably necessary in the circumstances.
Force likely to cause death or great bodily harm is justified in self-defense only if a person reasonably believes that such force is necessary to prevent death or great bodily harm.
--
1st. A man may defend himself and even commit a homicide for the prevention of any forcible and atrocious crime, which if completed would amount to a felony; and of course under the like circumstances, mayhem, wounding and battery would be excusable at common law. A man may repel force by force in defence of his person, property or habitation, against any one who manifests, intends, attempts, or endeavors, by violence or surprise, to commit a forcible felony, such as murder, rape, robbery, arson, burglary and the like. In these cases he is not required to retreat, but he may resist and even pursue his adversary, until he has secured himself from all danger.
2d. A man may defend himself when no felony has been threatened or attempted: 1. When the assailant attempts to beat another and there is no mutual combat, such as where one meets another and attempts to commit or does commit an assault and battery on him, the person attacked may defend himself, and; 2. An attempt to strike another, when sufficiently near so that that there is danger, the person assailed may strike first, and is not required to wait until he has been struck.
When there is a mutual combat upon a sudden quarrel both parties are the aggressors, and if in the fight one is killed it will be manslaughter at least, unless the survivor can prove two things: 1st. That before the mortal stroke was given be had refused any further combat, and had retreated as far as he could with safety; and 2d. That he killed his adversary from necessity, to avoid his own destruction.
Mrsavo - bogme i u good old USA bi ovo bilo bar manslaughter (nije spasavao sebe vec burazera, sto baca senku na afekt) - i to visestruki... + povredjivanje +opasnost...
Covek je jos jako dobro i prosao.
DigiCortex (ex. SpikeFun) - Cortical Neural Network Simulator:
http://www.digicortex.net/node/1 Videos:
http://www.digicortex.net/node/17 Gallery:
http://www.digicortex.net/node/25
PowerMonkey - Redyce CPU Power Waste and gain performance! -
https://github.com/psyq321/PowerMonkey